Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Papers 30 (2):117-143 (2001)
|Abstract||Abstract This paper contrasts the scholastic realisms of David Armstrong and Charles Peirce. It is argued that the so-called ?problem of universals? is not a problem in pure ontology (concerning whether universals exist) as Armstrong construes it to be. Rather, it extends to issues concerning which predicates should be applied where, issues which Armstrong sets aside under the label of ?semantics?, and which from a Peircean perspective encompass even the fundamentals of scientific methodology. It is argued that Peirce's scholastic realism not only presents a more nuanced ontology (distinguishing the existent from the real) but also provides more of a sense of why realism should be a position worth fighting for|
|Keywords||Armstrong Peirce universals realism existence|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paul Gould (2012). The Problem of Universals, Realism, and God. Metaphysica 13 (2):183-194.
David M. Armstrong (1978). Universals and Scientific Realism: A Theory of Universals Vol. Ii. Cambridge University Press.
Charles Landesman (1971). The Problem of Universals. New York,Basic Books.
Javier Cumpa (2012). Observation and Interpretation: The Problem of the Problem of Universals. [REVIEW] Metaphysica 13 (2):131-143.
Javier Kalhat (2008). Structural Universals and the Principle of Uniqueness of Composition. Grazer Philosophische Studien 76 (1):57-77.
David M. Armstrong (1978). Universals and Scientific Realism: Nominalism and Realism Vol. I. Cambridge University Press.
D. M. Armstrong (1989). Universals: An Opinionated Introduction. Westview Press.
David Malet Armstrong (1978). A Theory of Universals. Universals and Scientific Realism Volume Ii. Cambridge University Press.
D. M. Armstrong (1978). Universals and Scientific Realism. Cambridge University Press.
Evan Fales (1990). Causation and Universals. Routledge.
B. Aune, Universals and Scientific Realism, Vol 1, Nominalism and Realism, Vol 2, a Theory of Universals - Armstrong,Dm.
Gail Fine (1981). Armstrong on Relational and Nonrelational Realism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62:262-71.
John Bolender (2006). Nomic Universals and Particular Causal Relations: Which Are Basic and Which Are Derived? Philosophia 34 (4):405-410.
Theodore Sider (1995). Sparseness, Immanence, and Naturalness. Noûs 29 (3):360-377.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads13 ( #95,870 of 755,289 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,366 of 755,289 )
How can I increase my downloads?