David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 140 (2):149 - 159 (2008)
Nathan Salmon, in his paper Trans-World Identification and Stipulation (1996) purports to give a proof for the claim that facts concerning trans-world identity cannot be conceptually reduced to general facts. He calls this claim ‘Extreme Haecceitism.’ I argue that his proof is fallacious. However, I also contend that the analysis and ultimate rejection of his proof clarifies the fundamental issues that are at stake in the debate between the reductionist and haecceitist solutions to the problem of trans-world identity. These issues hinge on the ability of modal logic and possible worlds semantics to draw a hard and fast distinction between the logic and the metaphysics of modal logic. I shall claim that the considerations in this paper call into question the viability of such a distinction.
|Keywords||Transworld identity Haecceitism Essentialism Modal metaphysics Reductionism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Susan Haack (1978). Philosophy of Logics. Cambridge University Press.
Jon Barwise (1979). On Branching Quantifiers in English. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):47 - 80.
Nathan Salmon (1986). Modal Paradox: Parts and Counterparts, Points and Counterpoints. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 11 (1):75-120.
Nathan Salmon (1996). Trans-World Identification and Stipulation. Philosophical Studies 84 (2-3):203 - 223.
Jaakko Hintikka (2004). Independence-Friendly Logic and Axiomatic Set Theory. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 126 (1-3):313-333.
Citations of this work BETA
Matteo Morganti (2011). Substrata and Properties: From Bare Particulars to Supersubstantivalism? Metaphysica 12 (2):183-195.
Matteo Morganti (2009). Are the Bundle Theory and the Substratum Theory Really Twin Brothers? Axiomathes 19 (1):73--85.
Troy T. Catterson (2015). Sorting Out the Sortals: A Fregean Argument for Essentialism. Erkenntnis 80 (1):137-157.
Similar books and articles
Sara Negri (2011). Proof Analysis: A Contribution to Hilbert's Last Problem. Cambridge University Press.
Pavel Hrubeš (2007). Lower Bounds for Modal Logics. Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (3):941 - 958.
Anna Maidens (1998). Particles and the Perversely Philosophical Schoolchild: Rigid Designation, Haecceitism and Statistics. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):75-87.
H. Kushida & M. Okada (2003). A Proof-Theoretic Study of the Correspondence of Classical Logic and Modal Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (4):1403-1414.
Jens Johansson (2007). Non-Reductionism and Special Concern. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (4):641 – 657.
Alessandro Torza (2011). A Characterization of Haecceitism. Analytic Philosophy 52 (4):262-266.
Brad Skow (2008). Haecceitism, Anti-Haecceitism, and Possible Worlds: A Case Study. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (230):97-107.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads61 ( #69,438 of 1,796,442 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #347,915 of 1,796,442 )
How can I increase my downloads?