Graduate studies at Western
Religious Studies 31 (4):463 - 473 (1995)
|Abstract||The Christian mysteries, which consist of such doctrines as the Incarnation and the Trinity, pose a problem for anyone who seeks to reconcile the tenets of Christianity with reason. As Leibniz puts it, the mysteries are incomprehensible, improbable, and against appearances. Why should a reasonable individual believe in such mysteries? By answering this question, one responds to the objection that Christianity requires individuals to embrace patent nonsense. Leibniz maintains that the mysteries, although incomprehensible, can be explained sufficiently to justify belief in them. But how can the mysteries be both incomprehensible and explicable? In this paper, I will develop a Leibnizian account of why belief in the mysteries is justified.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Adrian Bardon (2001). Leibniz on the Epistemic Status of the Mysteries. Philosophy and Theology 13 (1):143-158.
Ursula Goldenbaum (2002). Spinoza's Parrot, Socinian Syllogisms, and Leibniz's Metaphysics. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (4):551-574.
Maria Rosa Antognazza (2001). The Defence of the Mysteries of the Trinity and the Incarnation: An Example of Leibniz's 'Other' Reason. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (2):283 – 309.
Iamblichus (1989). On the Mysteries =. Chthonios Books.
Thomas Poynor (2008). “How Can These Things Be?”. Newman Studies Journal 5 (1):51-62.
Iamblichus (1821/1968). Iamblichus on the Mysteries of the Egyptians, Chaldeans, and Assyrians. London, Stuart & Watkins.
Steven D. Boyer (2007). The Logic of Mystery. Religious Studies 43 (1):89-102.
Vemuri Ramesam (2008). Rel[I]Gion Demystified: Understanding Life's Mysteries in Terms of Latest Scientific Findings. Institute of Scientific Research on Vedas.
R. R. Bolgar (1960). Pagan Mysteries Edgar Wind, Pagan Mysteries in the Renaissance. Pp. 232; 77 Plates. London: Faber, 1958. Cloth, 50s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 10 (01):75-77.
H. Ll Hudson-Williams (1964). Andocides, on the Mysteries Douglas Macdowell: Andokides, On the Mysteries. Edited with Introduction, Commentary, and Appendixes. Pp. Xii+223. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1964. Cloth, 45s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 14 (02):145-147.
W. K. C. Guthrie (1959). Dionysiac Mysteries Martin P. Nilsson: The Dionysiac Mysteries of the Hellenistic and Roman Age. (Skriften Utgivna Av Svenska Institutet I Athen, 8°, V.) Pp. Viii + 150; 44 Figs. Lund: Gleerup, 1957. Paper, Kr. 30. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 9 (01):57-58.
W. K. C. Guthrie (1963). The Eleusinian Mysteries George E. Mylonas: Eleusis and the Eleusinian Mysteries. Pp. Xx+346; 88 Figs. Princeton: University Press (London: Routledge), 1962. Cloth, 6Os. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 13 (01):93-95.
Alvin Plantinga (2001). Rationality and Public Evidence: A Reply to Richard Swinburne. Religious Studies 37 (2):215-222.
Christian de Duve (2002). Mysteries of Life: Is There "Something Else"? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 45 (1):1-15.
Ralph Wedgwood (2008). Contextualism About Justified Belief. Philosophers' Imprint 8 (9):1-20.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads4 ( #189,051 of 739,318 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,318 )
How can I increase my downloads?