David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (3):181-203 (2007)
There is an international consensus that medical research involving humans should only be undertaken in accordance with ethical principles. Paradoxically though, there is no consensus over the kinds of activities that constitute research and should be subject to review. In the UK and elsewhere, research requiring review is distinguished from clinical audit. Unfortunately the two activities are not always easy to differentiate from one another. Moreover, as the volume of audit increases and becomes more formal in response to the demand for evidence-based practice in medicine, the overlap between research and audit grows more acute. Arguably, similar ethical standards and systems for ensuring that those standards are met should be applied regardless of whether or not a project is classified as research or audit. At a time when the research ethics review system in the UK is undergoing significant reform it is important that the opportunity is not missed to address the longstanding research-audit problem. We discuss suggestions for further reform that addresses this issue.
|Keywords||audit research ethics publication ethics ethics committees|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Merryn Ekberg (2012). Reassessing the Role of the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee. Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (4):335-352.
James Wilson & David Hunter (2010). Research Exceptionalism. American Journal of Bioethics 10 (8):45-54.
Similar books and articles
Wang Ying Hill, Ian Fraser & Philip Cotton (1998). Patients' Voices, Rights and Responsibilities: On Implementing Social Audit in Primary Health Care. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (13):1481-1497.
Robin W. Roberts & Peggy D. Dwyer (1998). An Analysis of Materiality and Reasonable Assurance: Professional Mystification and Paternalism in Auditing. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (5):115-124.
E. Cave & C. Nichols (2007). Reforming the Ethical Review System: Balancing the Rights and Interests of Research Participants with the Duty to Facilitate Good Research. Clinical Ethics 2 (2):74-79.
Nonna Martinov-Bennie & Gary Pflugrath (2009). The Strength of an Accounting Firm's Ethical Environment and the Quality of Auditors' Judgments. Journal of Business Ethics 87 (2):237 - 253.
T. Libby & L. Thorne (2007). The Development of a Measure of Auditors' Virtue. Journal of Business Ethics 71 (1):89 - 99.
G. Benhamou-Jantelet (2001). Nurses' Ethical Perceptions of Health Care and of Medical Clinical Research: An Audit in a French University Teaching Hospital. Nursing Ethics 8 (2):114-122.
Risako Morimoto, John Ash & Chris Hope (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility Audit: From Theory to Practice. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 62 (4):315 - 325.
Dipankar Ghosh & Terry L. Crain (1995). Ethical Standards, Attitudes Toward Risk, and Intentional Noncompliance: An Experimental Investigation. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 14 (5):353 - 365.
J. Berry (1997). Local Research Ethics Committees Can Audit Ethical Standards in Research. Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (6):379-381.
Hollis Ashbaugh (2004). Ethical Issues Related to the Provision of Audit and Non-Audit Services: Evidence From Academic Research. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 52 (2):143-148.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #220,360 of 1,096,960 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #107,139 of 1,096,960 )
How can I increase my downloads?