Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Economic Methodology 13 (1):49-75 (2006)
|Abstract||Understanding the factors determining economic growth has been a major concern for economists and governing bodies for many years. The Solow growth model and the endogenous growth models are the main theories tested and used in the growth literature. This paper discusses the main contributions to economic methodology and uses Lakatos's scientific research program framework to evaluate the main theoretical contributions to growth theory. Based on Lakatos's ideas, Solovian models are both empirically and theoretically progressive. Endogenous growth models, on the other hand, are not empirically corroborated, and thus not progressive in Lakatosian sense. However, there are many reasons for rational growth economists to continue working in this field, even facing empirical refutations of an important theoretical prediction. Endogenous growth models are promising in terms of generating enormous gains that will help us better understand the mechanisms of economic growth.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michal Brzezinski & Michal Dzielinski (2009). Is Endogenous Growth Theory Degenerating? Another Look at Lakatosian Appraisal of Growth Theories. Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (3):243-263.
Aharon Kantorovich (1978). An Ideal Model for the Growth of Knowledge in Research Programs. Philosophy of Science 45 (2):250-272.
Norton Garfinkle (2005). Supply‐Side Vs. Demand‐Side Tax Cuts and U.S. Economic Growth, 1951–2004. Critical Review 17 (3-4):427-448.
Nicolai J. Foss (1998). The New Growth Theory: Some Intellectual Growth Accounting. Journal of Economic Methodology 5 (2):223-246.
Patrick Eparvier (2005). Methods of Evolutionism and Rivalry with Neoclassical Analysis. The Example of the National System of Innovation Concept. Journal of Economic Methodology 12 (4):563-579.
Michael Ventimiglia (2008). Reclaiming the Peircean Cosmology: Existential Abduction and the Growth of the Self. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (4):pp. 661-680.
Roger Buis, Henri Barthou, Christian Brière & Joëlle Gefflaut (1995). Leaf Dissymmetry and Vein Growth Field. Acta Biotheoretica 43 (1-2).
Rainer Willi Maurer, Falsification of Theories Without Verification of Basic Statements – an Argument for the Possibility of Knowledge Growth.
H. A. van den Berg (1998). A Generic View of Classic Microbial Growth Models. Acta Biotheoretica 46 (2).
Cécile Lambert, Roger Buis & Marie-Thérèse L'Hardy-Halos (1992). Kinetics of Pleuridial Growth in Antithamnion Plumula (Rhodophyceae). Acta Biotheoretica 40 (2-3).
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-02-20
Total downloads1 ( #292,723 of 738,617 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?