The Animal Question: Why Nonhuman Animals Deserve Human Rights
Oxford University Press (2001)
| Abstract | How much do animals matter--morally? Can we keep considering them as second class beings, to be used merely for our benefit? Or, should we offer them some form of moral egalitarianism? Inserting itself into the passionate debate over animal rights, this fascinating, provocative work by renowned scholar Paola Cavalieri advances a radical proposal: that we extend basic human rights to the nonhuman animals we currently treat as "things." Cavalieri first goes back in time, tracing the roots of the debate from the 1970s, then explores not only the ethical but also the scientific viewpoints, examining the debate's precedents in mainstream Western philosophy. She considers the main proposals of reform that recently have been advanced within the framework of today's prevailing ethical perspectives. Are these proposals satisfying? Cavalieri says no, claiming that it is necessary to go beyond the traditional opposition between utilitarianism and Kantianism and focus on the question of fundamental moral protection. In the case of human beings, such protection is granted within the widely shared moral doctrine of universal human rights' theory. Cavalieri argues that if we examine closely this theory, we will discover that its very logic extends to nonhuman animals as beings who are owed basic moral and legal rights and that, as a result, human rights are not human after all. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Animal rights Speciesism | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Buy the book | $29.32 new (27% off) $37.64 direct from Amazon (6% off) Amazon page | |||||||||
| Call number | HV4708.C4313 2001 | |||||||||
| ISBN(s) | 0195173651 9780195173659 | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesStephen Thomas Newmyer (2006). Animals, Rights, and Reason in Plutarch and Modern Ethics. Routledge.
Uriah Kriegel (forthcoming). Animal Rights: A Non‐Consequentialist Approach. In K. Petrus & M. Wild (eds.), Animal Minds and Animal Morals.
Angus Taylor (1996). Animal Rights and Human Needs. Environmental Ethics 18 (3):249-264.
David Sztybel (2001). Animal Rights: Autonomy and Redundancy. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (3):259-273.
Mark Rowlands (1998). Animal Rights: A Philosophical Defence. St. Martin's Press.
Evelyn B. Pluhar (1995). Beyond Prejudice: The Moral Significance of Human and Nonhuman Animals. Duke University Press.
David DeGrazia (2002). Animal Rights: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Mark Rowlands (2009). Animal Rights: Moral Theory and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
Cass R. Sunstein & Martha Craven Nussbaum (eds.) (2004). Animal Rights: Current Debates and New Directions. Oxford University Press.
H. J. McCloskey (1979). Moral Rights and Animals. Inquiry 22 (1-4):23 – 54.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads43 ( #26,104 of 548,987 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,987 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
