Temporal indiscriminateness: The case of cluster bombs

Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):135-145 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that the current stock of anti-personnel cluster bombs are temporally indiscriminate, and, therefore, unjust weapons. The paper introduces and explains the idea of temporal indiscriminateness. It argues that to honor non-combatant immunity—in addition to not targeting civilians—one must adequately target combatants. Due to their high dud rate, cluster submunitions fail to target combatants with sufficient temporal accuracy, and, thereby, result in avoidable serious harm to non-combatants. The paper concludes that non-combatant immunity and the principle of discrimination require a moratorium on the use of current cluster munitions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Cluster Account of Art Reconsidered.Aaron Meskin - 2007 - British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (4):388-400.
The cluster theory of art.Stephen Davies - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (3):297-300.
The cluster account of art defended.Berys Gaut - 2005 - British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):273-288.
On the cluster account of art.Thomas Adajian - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (4):379-385.
The Technological Value Cluster (Value Cluster IV).William C. Frederick - 1995 - The Ruffin Series in Business Ethics:200-204.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-07-18

Downloads
50 (#304,573)

6 months
10 (#219,185)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?