The Space of Seeing-In
British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (3):271-278 (2011)
| Abstract | Recent work on seeing-in has taken a pluralist turn. There is variety among pictures, so we should expect variety among seeing-in. Dominic Lopes’s taxonomy of seeing-in is arguably the most thorough that is currently available. Lopes identifies five varieties of seeing-in. In this paper I identify a sixth: pseudo-actualism. This paper improves our current best taxonomy of seeing-in | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesRobert Hopkins (2003). Pictures, Phenomenology and Cognitive Science. The Monist 86 (4):653-675.
Robert Hopkins (2008). Reasons for Looking: Lopes on the Value of Pictures. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (2):556-569.
Alberto Voltolini (2009). How Demonstrative Pictorial Reference Grounds Contextualism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (3):402-418.
Andrew Huddleston (2012). In Defense of Artistic Value. Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):705-714.
Dominic Lopes (1996). Understanding Pictures. Oxford University Press.
Stuart Elden (2007). There is a Politics of Space Because Space is Political: Henri Lefebvre and the Production of Space. Radical Philosophy Review 10 (2):101-116.
Stuart Elden (2007). There is a Politics of Space Because Space is Political. Radical Philosophy Review 10 (2):101-116.
Dominic McIver Lopes (2003). Pictures and the Representational Mind. The Monist 86 (4):632-652.
Dominic McIver Lopes (2011). An Empathic Eye. In Amy Coplan & Peter Goldie (eds.), Empathy. Philosophical and psychological perspectives. Oxford Univerity Press.
Robert Hopkins (2010). Inflected Pictorial Experience: Its Treatment and Significance. In Catharine Abell & Katerina Bantinaki (eds.), Philosophical Perspectives on Picturing. Oxford University Press.
Dominic M. M. Lopes (1997). Art Media and the Sense Modalities: Tactile Pictures. Philosophical Quarterly 47 (189):425-440.
Alessandro Giovannelli (2008). Review: Dominic McIver Lopes: Sight and Sensibility: Evaluating Pictures. [REVIEW] Mind 117 (466):490-494.
Craig Callender (2005). Answers in Search of a Question: 'Proofs' of the Tri-Dimensionality of Space. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 36 (1):113-136.
Jason Gaiger (2009). Sense and Sensibility: Evaluating Pictures by Dominic Lopes. European Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):447-451.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-05-15Total downloads39 ( #30,446 of 556,776 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #39,010 of 556,776 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
