Would pluralist angels (really) need government?
Philosophical Studies 81 (2-3):227 - 246 (1996)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDouglas W. Kmiec (ed.) (2009). The American Constitutional Order: History, Cases, and Philosophy. Lexisnexis Matthew Bender.
Tobias Hoffmann (2007). Aquinas and Intellectual Determinism: The Test Case of Angelic Sin. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 89 (2):122-156.
Mavis Jones (2004). Policy Legitimation, Expert Advice, and Objectivity: 'Opening' the UK Governance Framework for Human Genetics. Social Epistemology 18 (2 & 3):247 – 270.
Eric Jergensen (2006). “If Men Were Angels . . .”. Teaching Ethics 6 (2):103-110.
Sheron Fraser-Burgess (2009). Problems with a Weakly Pluralist Approach to Democratic Education. The Pluralist 4 (2):1 - 16.
William Galston (2011). Parents, Government, and Children: Authority Over Education in a Pluralist Liberal Democracy. Law and Ethics of Human Rights 5 (2).
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads9 ( #115,463 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,847 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
