David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):38-53 (2003)
The singular position of Montesquieu's political philosophy seems to raise the question: Isn't the opposition between republicanism and liberalism a largely artificial one? On the one hand, the description of the republican vivere civile in the Spirit of the Laws testifies to the important ties that exist between Montesquieu and the tradition of ?civic humanism?. However, this apparent theoretical proximity between Montesquieu and the British Neo-Harringtonians ought not to be taken too far, obscuring the deep divergences that differentiate their respective positions, notably when it comes to the interpretation of history. Montesquieu's break from the republican tradition is exemplified by his rejection of its conception of freedom rooted in the citizens' necessary participation in power. But in the end, this does not enable us to conclude that he subscribes to a purely liberal theory. The British model shows that even if direct participation in the exercise of power is not necessary for the existence of liberty, a certain level of civic involvement and public awareness is needed. The liberal opposition between positive and negative liberty, political autonomy and enjoyment of rights without interference must therefore be transcended
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Georges Davy (1939). Pour le 250 E anniversaire de Montesquieu: Sur la méthode de Montesquieu. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 46 (3):571 - 586.
Ian Shapiro (1990). J. G. A. Pocock's Republicanism and Political Theory: A Critique and Reinterpretation. Critical Review 4 (3):433-471.
Lawrence Quill (2006). Liberty After Liberalism: Civic Republicanism in a Global Age. Palgrave Macmillan.
Geoffrey Brennan & Loren Lomasky (2006). Against Reviving Republicanism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (2):221-252.
Charles Secondat Montesquiedeu (1989). The Spirit of the Laws. Cambridge University Press.
Iseult Honohan (2002). Civic Republicanism. Routledge.
Thomas L. Pangle (2010). The Theological Basis of Liberal Modernity in Montesquieu's Spirit of the Laws. The University of Chicago Press.
Rebecca Kingston (ed.) (2009). Montesquieu and His Legacy. State University of New York Press.
Paul Anthony Rahe (ed.) (2006). Machiavelli's Liberal Republican Legacy. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads13 ( #121,151 of 1,101,690 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #292,019 of 1,101,690 )
How can I increase my downloads?