The case for re-thinking incest laws
Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):e11-e11 (2008)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesVera Bergelson (2013). Vice is Nice But Incest is Best: The Problem of a Moral Taboo. Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):43-59.
Jeffrey Sebo (2006). The Ethics of Incest. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):48-55.
Jerome Neu (1976). What is Wrong with Incest? Inquiry 19 (1-4):27 – 39.
Nancy Potter (1995). The Severed Head and Existential Dread: The Classroom as Epistemic Community and Student Survivors of Incest. Hypatia 10 (2):69 - 92.
Justin Leiber (2006). Instinctive Incest Avoidance: A Paradigm Case for Evolutionary Psychology Evaporates. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 36 (4):369–388.
Robert Mayer (1999). Lenin and the Practice of Dialectical Thinking. Science and Society 63 (1):40 - 62.
C. Haufe (2013). From Necessary Chances to Biological Laws. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (2):279-295.
Marc Lange (2005). Laws and Their Stability. Synthese 144 (3):415Ð432.
Marcello Guarini (2000). Horgan and Tienson on Ceteris Paribus Laws. Philosophy of Science 67 (2):301-315.
Dallas Willard (2003). A Realist Analysis of the Relationship Between Logic and Experience. Topoi 22 (1).
Naomi R. Cahn (2012). The New Kinship: Constructing Donor-Conceived Families. New York University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-24Total downloads37 ( #32,537 of 556,895 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,931 of 556,895 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
