A Peer group assessment of a radical pedagogical activist
Educational Philosophy and Theory 37 (5):761–764 (2005)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesLeigh Turner (2003). Promoting F.A.I.T.H. In Peer Review: Five Core Attributes of Effective Peer Review. Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (2):181-188.
David A. Borman (2006). Betrayal in Teaching: Persuasion in Kierkegaard, Theory and Performance. Continental Philosophy Review 39 (3):245-272.
Mark Braham (1965). Peer Group Deterrents to Intellectual Development During Adolescence. Educational Theory 15 (3):248-258.
Jeanne M. Logsdon, Harry van Buren Iii & Kathleen Rehbein (2008). Social Responsibility Ratings and Corporate Responses to Activist Shareholder Resolutions. Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 19:307-317.
Tone Saevi (2011). Lived Relationality as Fulcrum for Pedagogical–Ethical Practice. Studies in Philosophy and Education 30 (5):455-461.
David Sloan Wilson (1999). A Critique of R.D. Alexander's Views on Group Selection. Biology and Philosophy 14 (3).
Tomas Bogardus (2009). A Vindication of the Equal-Weight View. Episteme 6 (3):324-335.
Susan Hayes Greener (2000). Peer Assessment of Children's Prosocial Behaviour. Journal of Moral Education 29 (1):47-60.
Ronald N. Kostoff (1997). The Principles and Practices of Peer Review. Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1).
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads11 ( #99,396 of 548,969 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,969 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
