David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophia Mathematica 14 (3):318-337 (2006)
This paper addresses John Burgess's answer to the ‘Benacerraf Problem’: How could we come justifiably to believe anything implying that there are numbers, given that it does not make sense to ascribe location or causal powers to numbers? Burgess responds that we should look at how mathematicians come to accept: There are prime numbers greater than 1010 That, according to Burgess, is how one can come justifiably to believe something implying that there are numbers. This paper investigates what lies behind Burgess's answer and ends up as a rebuttal to Burgess's reasoning.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alan Baker (2010). No Reservations Required? Defending Anti-Nominalism. Studia Logica 96 (2):127-139.
Charles Chihara (2007). The Burgess-Rosen Critique of Nominalistic Reconstructions. Philosophia Mathematica 15 (1):54--78.
John P. Burgess (2008). Charles Parsons. Mathematical Thought and its Objects. Philosophia Mathematica 16 (3):402-409.
John P. Burgess (1992). Review: Constructibility and Mathematical Existence by Charles S. Chihara. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 101:916-918.
Matti Eklund (2012). Truth. [REVIEW] History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (1):106-108.
Mary Leng (2005). Revolutionary Fictionalism: A Call to Arms. Philosophia Mathematica 13 (3):277-293.
David Liggins (2006). Is There a Good Epistemological Argument Against Platonism? Analysis 66 (290):135–141.
Gábor Forrai (2010). What Mathematicians' Claims Mean : In Defense of Hermeneutic Fictionalism. Hungarian Philosophical Review 54 (4):191-203.
David Liggins (2007). Anti-Nominalism Reconsidered. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (226):104–111.
Charles S. Chihara (2006). Burgess's `Scientific' Arguments for the Existence of Mathematical Objects. Philosophia Mathematica 14 (3):318-337.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads25 ( #147,465 of 1,790,293 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #322,106 of 1,790,293 )
How can I increase my downloads?