Philosophy East and West 51 (3):315-324 (2001)
|Abstract||At first, the disciplined, proper, and moralistic Confucian might seem a far cry from the free, independent, and spontaneous individual of liberalism. However, Confucian self-discipline and ritual propriety are quite suitable for a democratic society. Liberal political theories privilege individual freedom, but there is little in them that deals with concrete ways in which this freedom can be exercised. Confucian theories of self-discipline and ritual propriety can fill this gap in liberal theory. Michel Foucault's investigations of Ancient Greek and Roman technologies of the self show that self-cultivation, self-discipline, and ritual conduct are indispensable for the proper practice of freedom. Thus, Foucault provides us with a new perspective from which to investigate and affirm the democratic potential of Confucianism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Karyn L. Lai (2006). Li in the "Analects": Training in Moral Comptence and the Question of Flexibility. Philosophy East and West 56 (1):69 - 83.
Wang Yunping (2005). Are Early Confucians Consequentialists? Asian Philosophy 15 (1):19-34.
Scott Cook (1997). Zhuang Zi and His Carving of the Confucian Ox. Philosophy East and West 47 (4):521-553.
Jinglin Li (2007). Philosophical Edification and Edificatory Philosophy: On the Basic Features of the Confucian Spirit. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (2):151-171.
Peter R. Woods & David A. Lamond (2011). What Would Confucius Do? – Confucian Ethics and Self-Regulation in Management. Journal of Business Ethics 102 (4):669-683.
Xinzhong Yao & Weiming Tu (eds.) (2010). Confucian Studies: Critical Concepts in Asian Philosophy. Routledge.
Brooke A. Ackerly (2005). Is Liberalism the Only Way Toward Democracy? Confucianism and Democracy. Political Theory 33 (4):547 - 576.
Ruiping Fan (2010). How Should We Treat Animals? A Confucian Reflection. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (1):79-96.
Kim Sungmoon (2009). Self-Transformation and Civil Society: Lockean Vs. Confucian. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (4).
Chae-bong Ham (2001). Confucian Rituals and the Technology of the Self: A Foucaultian Interpretation. Philosophy East and West 51 (3):315-324.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #114,394 of 722,932 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,932 )
How can I increase my downloads?