Soames on two-dimensionalism
| Abstract | Here the extension of a sentence token is a truth-value, the extension of a name is an individual, and so on. Scenarios are most often understood as centered possible worlds – i.e. ordered triples of worlds, individuals, and times - although they may also be understood in other ways. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesArthur Sullivan (2006). Reference and Description: The Case Against Two-Dimensionalism Scott Soames Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005, Xii + 359 Pp., $39.50. [REVIEW] Dialogue 45 (04):792-.
Kit Fine (2008). In Defence of Three-Dimensionalism. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements 83 (62):1-16.
Eros Corazza (2005). Reference and Description: The Case Against Two-Dimensionalism (Review of Scott Soames' Book). Philosophy Reviews.
Theodore Sider (1997). Four-Dimensionalism. Philosophical Review 106 (2):197-231.
Scott Soames (2007). The Substance and Significance of the Dispute Over Two-Dimensionalism. Philosophical Books 48 (1):34-49.
Scott Soames (2005). Reference and Description: The Case Against Two-Dimensionalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Takashi Yagisawa (2002). Primitive Worlds. Acta Analytica 17 (1):19-37.
Robert Michels (2012). Soames's Argument 1 Against Strong Two-Dimensionalism. Philosophical Studies 161 (3):403-420.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads87 ( #8,530 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,489 of 556,837 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
