Defeat reconsidered

Analysis 73 (1):49-51 (2013)
Abstract It appears to have gone unnoticed in the literature that Pollock's widely endorsed analysis of evidential defeat entails a remarkably strong symmetry principle, according to which, for any three propositions D, E and H, if both E and D provide a reason to believe H, then D is a defeater for E's support for H if and only if, in turn, E is a defeater for D's support for H. After illustrating the counterintuitiveness of this constraint, a simple, more suitable, alternative to the Pollockian account is offered.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,865
External links
  •   Try with proxy.
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    Jonathan Kvanvig (2007). Two Approaches to Epistemic Defeat. In Deane-Peter Baker (ed.), Alvin Plantinga. Cambridge University Press.
    Michael Bergmann (2000). Deontology and Defeat. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):87-102.
    George Bealer (1992). The Incoherence of Empiricism. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 66:99-138.
    Evan Riley (2010). Libertarian Self-Defeat. Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (2):200-226.
    Jaap Hage (2003). Law and Defeasibility. Artificial Intelligence and Law 11 (2-3):221-243.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2012-08-07

    Total downloads

    35 ( #34,753 of 556,803 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    7 ( #11,112 of 556,803 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums