David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics of Eros sheds light on contemporary feminist discourse by bringing into question some of the basic distinctions and categories that orchestrate it. The work of Luce Irigaray serves as a focus for interrogating the opposition between "French" and "Anglo-American" feminism as articulated in the debate over essentialism. Tina Chanter defends Irigaray against charges of essentialism by showing that such criticisms fail to consider the theoretical background of her work. Chanter demonstrates that Irigaray inherited and attempted to move beyond the philosophical framework of Hegel, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Derrida, and Levinas. In tackling the debate over essentialism, Chanter also reconsiders the sex/gender distinction that has been fundamental to feminist theory. Ethics of Eros seeks to recast the differences between "French" and "Anglo-American" feminism so that they no longer represent opposing views but become capable of productive exchanges. It explains the circumstances in which the debate over essentialism arose and reveals how essentialist misreadings of Irigaray gained currency in feminist theory. The book illuminates Irigaray's writings and demonstrates the insights they hold for current feminist theory and philosophy.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$4.91 used (90% off) $17.93 new (64% off) $48.95 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||B2430.I74.C47 1995|
|ISBN(s)||0415905230 0415905222 9780415905237|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Emanuela Bianchi (2006). Receptacle/Chōra: Figuring the Errant Feminine in Plato's Timaeus. Hypatia 21 (4):124-146.
Silvia Stoller & Translated by Camilla R. Nielsen (2005). Asymmetrical Genders: Phenomenological Reflections on Sexual Difference. Hypatia 20 (2):7-26.
Kimerer L. Lamothe (2005). Reason, Religion, and Sexual Difference: Resources for a Feminist Philosophy of Religion in Hegel's Phenomenology of Spirit. Hypatia 20 (1):120 - 149.
Christine Battersby (2000). Learning to Think Intercontinentally: Finding Australian Routes. Hypatia 15 (2):1-17.
Sara Heinämaa (1997). What is a Woman? Butler and Beauvoir on the Foundations of the Sexual Difference. Hypatia 12 (1):20-39.
Similar books and articles
Ping Xu (1995). Irigaray's Mimicry and the Problem of Essentialism. Hypatia 10 (4):76-89.
Claire Colebrook (1997). Feminist Philosophy and the Philosophy of Feminism: Irigaray and the History of Western Metaphysics. Hypatia 12 (1):79 - 98.
Tina Chanter (2010). Irigaray's Challenge to the Fetishistic Hegemony of the Platonic One and Many. In Elena Tzelepis & Athena Athanasiou (eds.), Rewriting Difference: Luce Irigaray and "the Greeks". State University of New York Press
Kate Ince (1996). Questions to Luce Irigaray. Hypatia 11 (2):122 - 140.
Shannon Winnubst (1999). Exceeding Hegel and Lacan: Different Fields of Pleasure Within Foucault and Irigaray. Hypatia 14 (1):13-37.
Lynda Haas (1993). Review: Of Waters and Women: The Philosophy of Luce Irigaray. [REVIEW] Hypatia 8 (4):150 - 159.
Joyce Nira Davidson & Mick Smith (1999). Wittgenstein and Irigaray: Gender and Philosophy in a Language (Game) of Difference. Hypatia 14 (2):72 - 96.
Joyce N. Davidson & Mick Smith (1999). Wittgenstein and Irigaray: Gender and Philosophy in a Language (Game) of Difference. Hypatia 14 (2):72-96.
Alison Stone (2006). Luce Irigaray and the Philosophy of Sexual Difference. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #133,846 of 1,789,829 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #262,646 of 1,789,829 )
How can I increase my downloads?