Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249):684 - 704 (2012)
|Abstract||This paper draws on the 'Fitting Attitudes' analysis of value to argue that we should take the concept of fittingness (rather than value) as our normative primitive. I will argue that the fittingness framework enhances the clarity and expressive power of our normative theorising. Along the way, we will see how the fittingness framework illuminates our understanding of various moral theories, and why it casts doubt on the Global Consequentialist idea that acts and (say) eye colours are normatively on a par. We will see why even consequentialists, in taking rightness to be in some sense determined by goodness, should not think that rightness is conceptually reducible goodness. Finally, I will use the fittingness framework to explicate the distinction between consequentialist and deontological theories, with particular attention to the contentious case of Rule Consequentialism|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Thomas J. Regan (1998). Justice as Fittingness. International Philosophical Quarterly 38 (3):332-333.
David B. Resnik (1992). The Fittingness Theory of Truth. Philosophical Studies 68 (1):95 - 101.
Oliver D. Crisp (2008). On the 'Fittingness' of the Virgin Birth. Heythrop Journal 49 (2):197–221.
O. McLeod (1998). Justice as Fittingness. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 17 (1):61-75.
Alastair Norcross (1997). Good and Bad Actions. Philosophical Review 106 (1):1-34.
Jussi Suikkanen (2008). A Dilemma for Rule-Consequentialism. Philosophia 36 (1):141-150.
Todd Long (2012). Mentalist Evidentialism Vindicated (and a Super-Blooper Epistemic Design Problem for Proper Function Justification). Philosophical Studies 157 (2):251-266.
Jonathan Way (forthcoming). Value and Reasons to Favour. In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 8. Oxford University Press.
Macalester Bell (2011). Globalist Attitudes and the Fittingness Objection. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):449-472.
Leo Zaibert (2006). The Fitting, the Deserving, and the Beautiful. Journal of Moral Philosophy 3 (3):331-350.
Added to index2010-08-17
Total downloads177 ( #2,315 of 739,406 )
Recent downloads (6 months)54 ( #1,007 of 739,406 )
How can I increase my downloads?