David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Analysis, Vol. 45, June 1984, George Rea published a paper attacking my claim that there could be ‘indeterminate minds'. This paper is a reply to his attack. I claim, again, that such ‘minds’ are possible – entities such that it is indeterminate whether or not these entities are people with minds.
|Keywords||minds persons borderline cases|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Thomas W. Smythe (1989). Disembodied Minds and Personal Identity. Philosophy Research Archives 14:415-423.
Frank Jackson (2003). Mind and Illusion. In Anthony O'Hear (ed.), Minds and Persons. Cambridge University Press. 421--442.
Anil Gomes (2011). Is There a Problem of Other Minds? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):353-373.
David Papineau (2001). Human Minds. In Anthony O'Hear (ed.), Minds and Persons. Cambridge University Press. 159-183.
Stephen R. L. Clark (2003). Non-Personal Minds. In Minds and Persons: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement: 53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 185-209.
Hugh Chandler (1985). Indeterminate People. Analysis 45 (3):141-145.
Added to index2009-07-03
Total downloads107 ( #9,502 of 1,098,973 )
Recent downloads (6 months)10 ( #19,089 of 1,098,973 )
How can I increase my downloads?