David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In Analysis, Vol. 45, June 1984, George Rea published a paper attacking my claim that there could be ‘indeterminate people'. This paper is a reply to his attack. I claim, again, that such ‘people’ are possible – entities such that it is indeterminate whether or not these entities are people.
|Keywords||Minds people indeterminacy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Irwin Goldstein (2007). Solipsism and the Solitary Language User. Philosophical Papers 36 (1):35-47.
Terence E. Wilkerson (1974). Minds, Brains And People. Oxford,: Clarendon Press.
J. Jorgensen (1949). Remarks Concerning the Concept of Mind and the Problem of Other People's Minds. Theoria 15 (1‐3):116-127.
Adam Waytz, Kurt Gray, Nicholas Epley & Daniel Wegner (2010). Causes and Consequences of Mind Perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (8):383-388.
Peter B. M. Vranas (2005). The Indeterminacy Paradox: Character Evaluations and Human Psychology. Noûs 39 (1):1–42.
Anil Gomes (2011). Is There a Problem of Other Minds? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):353-373.
Hugh Chandler (1985). Indeterminate People. Analysis 45 (3):141-145.
Added to index2010-03-06
Total downloads81 ( #16,618 of 1,103,045 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #36,701 of 1,103,045 )
How can I increase my downloads?