Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (3):255 - 265 (2007)
|Abstract||I discuss Bernard Williams’ ‘integrity objection’ – his version of the demandingness objection to unreasonably demanding ‘extremist’ moral theories such as consequentialism – and argue that it is best understood as presupposing the internal reasons thesis. However, since the internal reasons thesis is questionable, so is Williams’ integrity objection. I propose an alternative way of bringing out the unreasonableness of extremism, based on the notion of the agent’s autonomy, and show how an objection to this proposal can be outflanked by a strategy that also outflanks the ‘paradox of deontology.’.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Douglas W. Portmore (forthcoming). Consequentialism. In Christian Miller (ed.), The Continuum Companion to Ethical Theory. Continuum.
Alexander Miller (1997). Lenin's Anticipation of Bernard Williams's Integrity Objection to Utilitarianism. Journal of Value Inquiry 31 (4):503-510.
Dale Dorsey (2012). Weak Anti-Rationalism and the Demands of Morality†. Noûs 46 (1):1-23.
Greg Scherkoske (2010). Integrity and Moral Danger. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (3):335-358.
Kevin Vallier (2011). Liberalism, Religion And Integrity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):149 - 165.
Attila Tanyi (2012). The Case for Authority. In S. Schleidgen (ed.), Should we always act morally? Essays on Overridingness. Tectum.
Brian McElwee (2011). Impartial Reasons, Moral Demands. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (4):457-466.
David Sobel (2007). The Impotence of the Demandingness Objection. Philosophers' Imprint 7 (8):1-17.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads125 ( #3,852 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #10,333 of 549,087 )
How can I increase my downloads?