Imagination, indexicality, and intensions [Book Review]

John Perry's book Knowledge, Possibility, and Consciousness is a lucid and engaging defense of a physicalist view of consciousness against various anti-physicalist arguments. In what follows, I will address Perry's responses to the three main anti-physicalist arguments he discusses: the zombie argument , the knowledge argument , and the modal argument
Keywords Imagination  Indexicality  Intension  Metaphysics  Zombie
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2004.tb00334.x
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,667
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
David J. Chalmers (2002). Does Conceivability Entail Possibility? In Tamar S. Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Conceivability and Possibility. Oxford University Press 145--200.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Benj Hellie (2011). There It Is. Philosophical Issues 21 (1):110-164.
Michael McGlone (2010). Putnam on What Isn't in the Head. Philosophical Studies 151 (2):199 - 205.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

229 ( #6,699 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

18 ( #43,617 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.