Ruth Chang (ed.)
Harvard University Press (1997)
|Abstract||This paper is the introduction to the volume. It gives an argumentative view of the philosophical landscape concerning incommensurability and incomparability. It argues that incomparability, not incommensurability, is the important phenomenon on which philosophers should be focusing and that the arguments for the existence of incomparability are so far not compelling.|
|Keywords||Comparison (Philosophy Practical reason|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$73.81 used (9% off) $493.57 new Amazon page|
|Call number||BD236.I53 1997|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Cristian Constantinescu (2012). Value Incomparability and Indeterminacy. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (1):57-70.
Nien-hê Hsieh (2005). Equality, Clumpiness and Incomparability. Utilitas 17 (2):180-204.
Martijn Boot (2009). Parity, Incomparability and Rationally Justified Choice. Philosophical Studies 146 (1):75 - 92.
Ruth Chang (2005). Parity, Interval Value, and Choice. Ethics 115 (2):331-350.
Ruth Chang (2002). The Possibility of Parity. Ethics 112 (4):659-688.
Ruth Chang (ed.) (1997). Incommensurability, Incomparability and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press.
Adam Morton (2000). Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason, Ruth Chang (Ed.), Harvard University Press, 1998, 303 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 16 (1):147-174.
Norbert Anwander (2001). Ruth Chang, Incommensurability, Incomparability and Practical Reason. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (2):193-195.
John Broome (1997). Is Incommensurability Vaguness? In Ruth Chang (ed.), Incommensurability, Incomparability and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads103 ( #7,369 of 722,826 )
Recent downloads (6 months)19 ( #6,862 of 722,826 )
How can I increase my downloads?