Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||Thanks to all the people who responded to my enquiry about the status of the Continuum Hypothesis. This is a really fascinating subject, which I could waste far too much time on. The following is a summary of some aspects of the feeling I got for the problems. This will be old hat to set theorists, and no doubt there are a couple of embarrassing misunderstandings, but it might be of some interest to non professionals.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
James Hawthorne (2011). Bayesian Conﬁrmation Theory. In S. French & J. Saatsi (eds.), Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Science. Continuum Press.
Kai Hauser (2002). Is Cantor's Continuum Problem Inherently Vague? Philosophia Mathematica 10 (3):257-285.
David C. Noelle (1998). Is the Dynamical Hypothesis Falsifiable? On Unification in Theories of Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):647-648.
James Hawthorne (1993). Bayesian Induction IS Eliminative Induction. Philosophical Topics 21 (1):99-138.
Paul J. Cohen (1966). Set Theory and the Continuum Hypothesis. New York, W. A. Benjamin.
Gregory H. Moore (2011). Early History of the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis: 1878—1938. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 17 (4):489-532.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads277 ( #776 of 739,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #13,438 of 739,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?