In P. V. Spade (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ockham. Cambridge (1999)
|Abstract||William of Ockham's semantic theory was founded on the idea that thought takes place in a language not unlike the languages in which spoken and written communication occur. This mental language was held to have a number of features in common with everyday languages. For example, mental language has simple terms, not unlike words, out of which complex expressions can be constructed. As with words, each of these terms has some meaning, or signification; in fact Ockham held that the signification of everyday words derives precisely from the signification of mental terms. Furthermore, the meaning of a mental expression depends directly on the meaning of its constituent terms, as is the case with expressions in more familiar languages|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paul Vincent Spade (1980). Synonymy and Equivocation in Ockham's Mental Language. Journal of the History of Philosophy 18 (1):9-22.
Gordon Hull (2006). Hobbes's Radical Nominalism. Epoché 11 (1):201-223.
Hester Goodenough Gelber (1984). I Cannot Tell a Lie. Hugh Lawton's Critique of Ockham on Mental Language. Franciscan Studies 44:141-179.
Yiwei Zheng (2001). Ockham's Connotation Theory and Ontological Elimination. Journal of Philosophical Research 26:623-634.
Martin Lenz (2008). Why is Thought Linguistic? Ockham's Two Conceptions of the Intellect. Vivarium 46 (3):302-317.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads65 ( #13,961 of 549,069 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #19,186 of 549,069 )
How can I increase my downloads?