Long-term care: Dignity, autonomy, family integrity, and social sustainability: The Hong Kong experience
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (5):401 – 424 (2007)
|Abstract||This article reveals the outcome of a study on the perceptions of elders, family members, and healthcare professionals and administration providing care in a range of different long-term care facilities in Hong Kong with primary focus on the concepts of autonomy and dignity of elders, quality and location of care, decision making, and financing of long term care. It was found that aging in place and family care were considered the best approaches to long term care insofar as procuring and balancing the values of dignity, autonomy, family integrity and social sustainability were concerned. An elder having the final say was generally accepted. The results also initiated the importance of sharing of financial responsibility among elders, children and government albeit the emphasis was placed on individuals. Furthermore, dignity of elders was not considered purely a synonym of autonomy, but it had also to do with respect, family and social connections.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Hong Fung, Nancy Tse & E. K. Yeoh (1999). Health Care Reform and Societal Values. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (6):638 – 652.
Julia Tao Lai Po-wah (1999). Does It Really Care? The Harvard Report on Health Care Reform for Hong Kong. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (6):571 – 590.
F. Cheng, Mary Ip, K. K. Wong & W. W. Yan (1998). Critical Care Ethics in Hong Kong: Cross-Cultural Conflicts as East Meets West. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (6):616 – 627.
Mark G. Kuczewski (1999). Ethics in Long-Term Care: Are the Principles Different? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (1):15-29.
George J. Agich (1993). Autonomy and Long-Term Care. Oxford University Press.
H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr (2007). Long-Term Care: The Family, Post-Modernity, and Conflicting Moral Life-Worlds. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (5):519 – 536.
Ruiping Fan (2007). Which Care? Whose Responsibility? And Why Family? A Confucian Account of Long-Term Care for the Elderly. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (5):495 – 517.
Julia Tao Lai Po Wah (2007). Dignity in Long-Term Care for Older Persons: A Confucian Perspective. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (5):465 – 481.
Eugene V. Boisaubin, Adeline Chu & Janine M. Catalano (2007). Perceptions of Long-Term Care, Autonomy, and Dignity, by Residents, Family and Care-Givers: The Houston Experience. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (5):447 – 464.
Xiaomei Zhai & Ren Zong Qiu (2007). Perceptions of Long-Term Care, Autonomy, and Dignity, by Residents, Family and Caregivers: The Beijing Experience. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 32 (5):425 – 445.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #95,713 of 740,170 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,170 )
How can I increase my downloads?