Mou Zongsan and Tang Junyi on Zhang Zai's and Wang Fuzhi's Philosophies of Qi : A Critical Reflection
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (1):85-98 (2011)
Fuzhi’s philosophies of qi. In this essay, both the strength and weakness of their interpretations will be critically examined. As a contrast, an alternative interpretation of the School of qi in Song-Ming Neo-Confucianism will be outlined. This new interpretation will uncover that, like Leibniz, Zhang Zai and Wang Fuzhi introduced a non-substantivalist approach in natural philosophy in terms of an innovative concept of force. This interpretation not only helps to show the limitations of Mou Zongsan’s and Tang Junyi’s understandings of Zhang Zai’s and Wang Fuzhi’s doctrines of qi, but also indicates a way to bridge the traditional Chinese philosophy of nature and modern physics. More generally, our critical discussions will bring to light a new angle with which to re-appreciate Mou Zongsan’s and Tang Junyi’s contributions to the development of Confucianism
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Wing-tsit Chan (1963). A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton, N.J.,Princeton University Press.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1951). Selections. New York, Scribner.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Wing-Cheuk Chan (2011). Mou Zongsan on Confucian and Kant's Ethics: A Critical Reflection. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 38 (s1):146-164.
Andres Siu-Kwong Tang (2011). Mou Zongsan's “Transcendental” Interpretation of Huayan Buddhism. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 38 (2):238-256.
Qiyong Guo (2007). Mou Zongsan's View of Interpreting Confucianism by “Moral Autonomy”. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 2 (3):345-362.
Sébastien Billioud (2011). Thinking Through Confucian Modernity: A Study of Mou Zongsan's Moral Metaphysics. Brill.
Stephan Schmidt (2011). Mou Zongsan, Hegel, and Kant: The Quest for Confucian Modernity. Philosophy East and West 61 (2):260-302.
Chunfeng Jin (2010). A Reconsideration of the Characteristics of Song-Ming Li Xue. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (3):352-376.
JeeLoo Liu (2005). The Status of Cosmic Principle in Neo-Confucian Metaphysics. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 32 (3):391-407.
Jason Clower (2010). The Unlikely Buddhologist: Tiantai Buddhism in Mou Zongsan's New Confucianism. Brill.
Wing-Cheuk Chan (2011). On Mou Zongsan's Hermeneutic Application of Buddhism. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 38 (2):174-189.
Chan Wing-Cheuk (2005). Mou Zongsan on Zen Buddhism. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 5 (1):73-88.
Wing-Cheuk Chan (2006). Mou Zongsan on Zen Buddhism. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 5 (1):73-88.
Wing-Cheuk Chan & Henry C. H. Shiu (2011). Introduction: Mou Zongsan and Chinese Buddhism. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 38 (2):169-173.
Added to index2010-12-23
Total downloads43 ( #96,154 of 1,796,455 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #135,679 of 1,796,455 )
How can I increase my downloads?