Graduate studies at Western
In Tamar S. Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Perceptual Experience. Oxford University Press (2006)
|Abstract||In the Garden of Eden, we had unmediated contact with the world. We were directly acquainted with objects in the world and with their properties. Objects were simply presented to us without causal mediation, and properties were revealed to us in their true intrinsic glory.|
|Keywords||Color Constancy Matching Perception Frege, Gottlob|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mark Eli Kalderon (2008). Metamerism, Constancy, and Knowing Which. Mind 117 (468):549-585.
David R. Hilbert (2005). Color Constancy and the Complexity of Color. Philosophical Topics 33 (1):141-158.
David M. Rosenthal (2001). Color, Mental Location, and the Visual Field. Consciousness And Cognition 10 (1):85-93.
Michael Madary (2012). Husserl on Perceptual Constancy. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):145-165.
Tamar Szabó Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.) (2006). Perception and the Fall From Eden. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Peter W. Ross (2012). Perceived Colors and Perceived Locations: A Problem for Color Subjectivism. American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (2):125-138.
Joshua Gert (2010). Color Constancy and the Color/Value Analogy. Ethics 121 (1).
Gary C. Hatfield (2009). Perception and Cognition: Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology. Oxford University Press.
Gary Hatfield (1992). Color Perception and Neural Encoding: Does Metameric Matching Entail a Loss of Information? Philosophy of Science Association 1992:492-504.
Susanna Schellenberg (2008). The Situation-Dependency of Perception. Journal of Philosophy 105 (2):55-84.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads272 ( #804 of 733,590 )
Recent downloads (6 months)24 ( #5,271 of 733,590 )
How can I increase my downloads?
|Start a new thread||There is 1 thread in this forum|
University of Cincinnati
Following a suggestion from Dave Chalmers, I am copying to here a query that I originally posted in the Epistemology thread. Dave will repost his answer and then I will follow up. I do have some questions about his answer that might be useful. Dave, since you're still hanging on to this thread, may I change directions a bit and press the question I asked you when I was there? What I wanted to know was whether it was fair to characterize your position (in your Eden paper) as being that perceptions have conceptual content but do not have conceptual structure. Clearly in that paper you are deliberating over whether perceptions have Russellian or Fregean or, your own invention, Edenic contents. These are all species of what I am calling conceptual contents. So as I am using the term, it seems to me clear that you think perceptions have conceptual content. The fact that you opt for Edenic content makes that, if anything, even clearer (since it's rather easier to see the ... (read more)