|Abstract||Plantinga claims that, at least for some people, the belief that God exists is ‘properly basic,’ or rather that they have properly basic beliefs that entail the existence of God. I think the underlying idea here is that we all have a properly working sensus divinitatus. This guarantees the existence of God. But, of course, if God does not exist, then our sensus divinitatus is not working properly, i.e. is not, really a sensus divinitatus. The issue as to whether there is or is not a God does not, or should not, come to an end with a claim of proper basicality.|
|Keywords||Properly Basic sensus divinitatus The existence of God Plantinga|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Jeremy Randel Koons (2011). Plantinga on Properly Basic Belief in God: Lessons From the Epistemology of Perception. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (245):839-850.
C. Stephen Evans (1988). Kierkegaard and Plantinga on Belief in God. Faith and Philosophy 5 (1):25-39.
Philip L. Quinn (1985). In Search of the Foundations of Theism. Faith and Philosophy 2 (4):469-486.
Derek S. Jeffreys (1997). How Reformed is Reformed Epistemology? Alvin Plantinga and Calvin's ‘Sensus Divinitatis’. Religious Studies 33 (4):419-431.
Donald Hatcher (1986). Plantinga and Reformed Epistemology. Philosophy and Theology 1 (1):84-95.
Basil Smith (2000). Plantinga and Wittgenstein on Properly Basic Beliefs. Philo 3 (1):32-40.
Michael Czapkay Sudduth (1998). Calvin, Plantinga, and the Natural Knowledge of God. Faith and Philosophy 15 (1):92-103.
Richard Swinburne (2001). Plantinga on Warrant. Religious Studies 37 (2):203-214.
Added to index2011-05-02
Total downloads89 ( #7,919 of 549,594 )
Recent downloads (6 months)16 ( #3,940 of 549,594 )
How can I increase my downloads?