David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Paley’s ‘proof’ of the existence of God, or some supposed version of it, is well known. In this paper I offer the real thing and two objections to it. One objection is Hume's, and the other is provided by Darwin.
|Keywords||Philosophy of Religion Metaphysics Existence of God Darwin|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
David Twetten (2006). On Which 'God' Should Be the Target of a 'Proof of God's Existence'. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:75-80.
Richard Messer (1993). Does God's Existence Need Proof? Oxford University Press.
Bill Spencer (2006). Paley's Teleological Argument and Its Significance. Dialogue 48 (2-3):62 - 65.
George I. Mavrodes (1970). The Rationality of Belief in God. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
Lydia Schumacher (2011). The Lost Legacy of Anselm's Argument: Re-Thinking the Purpose of Proofs for the Existence of God. Modern Theology 27 (1):87 - 101.
David Braine (1988). The Reality of Time and the Existence of God: The Project of Proving God's Existence. Oxford University Press.
Cecilia Wee (2012). Descartes's Ontological Proof of God's Existence. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (1):23 - 40.
Petr Hájek (2008). Ontological Proofs of Existence and Non-Existence. Studia Logica 90 (2):257 - 262.
Added to index2012-06-26
Total downloads119 ( #10,464 of 1,410,035 )
Recent downloads (6 months)14 ( #16,280 of 1,410,035 )
How can I increase my downloads?