Revisability and conceptual change in "two dogmas of empiricism"
Journal of Philosophy 108 (8) (2011)
| Abstract | W.V. Quine’s article “Two Dogmas of Empiricism” is one of the most influential works in 20thcentury philosophy. The article is cast most explicitly as an argument against logical empiricists such as Carnap, arguing against the analytic/synthetic distinction that they appeal to along with their verificationism. But the article has been read much more broadly as an attack on the notion.. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesHerbert Schnädelbach (2003). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Fifty Years After. Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):7-12.
Paul O.’Grady (1999). Carnap and Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):1015-1027.
Paul O'Grady (1999). Carnap and Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):1015-1027.
Willem R. de Jong (2001). Bernard Bolzano, Analyticity and the Aristotelian Model of Science. Kant-Studien 92 (3):328-349.
Marian David (1996). Analyticity, Carnap, Quine, and Truth. Philosophical Perspectives 10:281 - 296.
Cory Juhl (2009). Analyticity. Routledge.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-08-21Total downloads305 ( #407 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)29 ( #1,612 of 549,122 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
