Realism in the Desert and in the Jungle: Reply to French, Ghins, and Psillos
Erkenntnis (forthcoming)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Fabio Gironi & Stathis Psillos (2012). Of Realist Turns: A Conversation with Stathis Psillos. Speculations:367-427.
Mario Alai (2012). Levin and Ghins on the “No Miracle” Argument and Naturalism. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):85-110.
Mohamed Elsamahi (2005). A Critique of Localized Realism. Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1350-1360.
Ioannis Votsis (2005). The Upward Path to Structural Realism. Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1361-1372.
Shelly Kagan (2012). The Geometry of Desert. Oxford University Press.
Peter M. Ainsworth (2009). Newman's Objection. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (1):135-171.
Michel Ghins (1992). Scientific Realism and Invariance. Philosophical Issues 2:249-262.
Daniel McArthur (2006). Recent Debates Over Structural Realism. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 37 (2):209 - 224.
Bas C. van Fraassen (2010). Reply to Contessa, Ghins, and Healey. Analysis 70 (3):547-556.
S. Smilansky (1996). Discussion. The Connection Between Responsibility and Desert: The Crucial Distinction. Mind 105 (419):485-486.
Saul Smilansky (1996). The Connection Between Responsibility and Desert: The Crucial Distinction. Mind 105 (419):485-486.
Gerald Doppelt (2005). Empirical Success or Explanatory Success: What Does Current Scientific Realism Need to Explain? Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1076-1087.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2012-12-04Total downloads12 ( #93,336 of 549,068 )Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #5,415 of 549,068 )How can I increase my downloads? |

