Strong and weak emergence

In P. Davies & P. Clayton (eds.), The Re-Emergence of Emergence. Oxford University Press (2006)
The term ‘emergence’ often causes confusion in science and philosophy, as it is used to express at least two quite different concepts. We can label these concepts _strong_ _emergence_ and _weak emergence_. Both of these concepts are important, but it is vital to keep them separate.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,914
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Elanor Taylor (2015). An Explication of Emergence. Philosophical Studies 172 (3):653-669.
Olivier Sartenaer (2015). Synchronic Vs. Diachronic Emergence: A Reappraisal. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 5 (1):31-54.
James L. McClelland (2010). Emergence in Cognitive Science. Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (4):751-770.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

403 ( #1,304 of 1,725,565 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

33 ( #32,557 of 1,725,565 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.