Strong and weak emergence
In P. Davies & P. Clayton (eds.), The Re-Emergence of Emergence. Oxford University Press (2006)
| Abstract | The term ‘emergence’ often causes confusion in science and philosophy, as it is used to express at least two quite different concepts. We can label these concepts _strong_ _emergence_ and _weak emergence_. Both of these concepts are important, but it is vital to keep them separate | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesPaul Hovda (2008). Quantifying Weak Emergence. Minds and Machines 18 (4).
Mark Moyer (2008). Weak and Global Supervenience Are Strong. Philosophical Studies 138 (1):125 - 150.
Xiaoping Chen (2011). Various Concepts of “Supervenience” and Their Relations: A Comment on Kim's Theory of Supervenience. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (2):316-333.
Paul Humphreys (2008). Computational and Conceptual Emergence. Philosophy of Science 75 (5):584-594.
Mark A. Bedau (1997). Weak Emergence. Philosophical Perspectives 11:375-399.
Mark A. Bedau (2008). Is Weak Emergence Just in the Mind? Minds and Machines 18 (4).
Mark A. Bedau (2002). Downward Causation and the Autonomy of Weak Emergence. Principia 6 (1):5-50.
Paul Humphreys (2008). Synchronic and Diachronic Emergence. Minds and Machines 18 (4).
Carl Gillett (2002). The Varieties of Emergence: Their Purposes, Obligations and Importance. Grazer Philosophische Studien 65 (1):95-121.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads302 ( #434 of 549,198 )Recent downloads (6 months)18 ( #3,391 of 549,198 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
