The conflicting loyalties of statism and globalism: Can global democracy resolve the liberal conundrum?
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Metaphilosophy 40 (1):65-76 (2009)
Abstract: The cosmopolitan ideal of liberal universalism seems to be at odds with liberalism's insistence on national borders for liberal democratic communities, creating disparate standards of distributive justice for insiders and outsiders. The liberal's dilemma on the question of cosmopolitan justice would seem to be an extension of this broader conundrum of conflicting loyalties of statism and globalism. The challenge for liberalism, then, seems to be to show how the practices of exclusive membership embody the principle of moral equality. While discerning a variety of liberal reasons to give some scope to the claim that statism and globalism need not be an irreconcilable dilemma within liberalism, the essay argues that these reasons fail to provide a satisfactory resolution. Instead, the essay points out, global democracy can be the direction for both a statist and a cosmopolitan liberal, and the two camps a case not of conflicting loyalties but of multiple loyalties.
|Keywords||equality cosmopolitanism coercion global democracy international law globalism liberalism reciprocity distributive justice statism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Michael Blake (2001). Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy. Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 (3):257–296.
Michael Blake (2003). Reciprocity, Stability, and Intervention: The Ethics of Disequilibrium. In Dean Chatterjee & Donald Scheid (eds.), Ethics and Foreign Intervention. Cambridge University Press. 53--72.
Larry May, Kenneth Henley, Alistair Macleod, Rex Martin, David Duquette, Lucinda Peach, Helen Stacy, William Nelson, Steven Lee, Stephen Nathanson & Jonathan Schonsheck (2005). Universal Human Rights: Moral Order in a Divided World. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Andrew Oldenquist (2008). 'Varieties of Nationalism. In Deen Chatterjee (ed.), Democracy in a Global World. Rowman&Littlefield. 147--60.
John Rawls (1999). The Law of Peoples. Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Katrin Flikschuh (2004). The Limits of Liberal Cosmopolitanism. Res Publica 10 (2):175-192.
Jonathan Jacobs (2011). Criminal Justice and the Liberal Polity. Criminal Justice Ethics 30 (2):173-191.
Barbara J. Thayer-Bacon (2006). Beyond Liberal Democracy: Dewey's Renascent Liberalism. Education and Culture 22 (2):19-30.
Ryoa Chung (2003). The Cosmopolitan Scope of Republican Citizenship. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):135-154.
Enzo Rossi (2008). Liberal Democracy and the Challenge of Ethical Diversity. Human Affairs 18 (1):10-22.
Aaron Maltais (2008). Global Warming and the Cosmopolitan Political Conception of Justice. Environmental Politics 17 (4):592-609.
Kok-Chor Tan (2002). Liberal Nationalism and Cosmopolitan Justice. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (4):431-461.
Added to index2009-02-19
Total downloads43 ( #39,172 of 1,101,679 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #35,000 of 1,101,679 )
How can I increase my downloads?