'The good man is the measure of all things': objectivity without world-centredness in Aristotle's moral epistemology
|Abstract||I begin by contrasting Aristotle’s ‘world-centred’ general epistemology, and his ‘mind-centred’ (more exactly, ‘agathos-centred’) moral epistemology. I argue that Aristotle takes this approach, not because he doubts the objectivity of ethics, nor because he is an ‘ethical particularist’ (whatever one of those is), but because of the reflexive nature of ethics as a study. I further argue that, by taking the notion that ‘the good man is the measure of all things’ as central to Aristotle’s ethics, we can see how to unify coherently the rather embarrassingly diverse ethical resources that Aristotle offers us.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Eugene Garver (2006). Confronting Aristotle's Ethics: Ancient and Modern Morality. University of Chicago Press.
Skip Worden (2009). Aristotle's Natural Wealth: The Role of Limitation in Thwarting Misordered Concupiscence. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 84 (2):209 - 219.
Kathleen V. Wilkes (1978). The Good Man and the Good for Man in Aristotle's Ethics. Mind 87 (348):553-571.
Christopher P. Long (2010). Aristotle on the Nature of Truth. Cambridge University Press.
J. M. E. Moravcsik (1968). Aristotle: A Collection of Critical Essays. Melbourne, Macmillan.
J. M. E. Moravcsik (1967). Aristotle. Garden City, N.Y.,Anchor Books.
David Keyt (2007). The Good Man and the Upright Citizen in Aristotle's Ethics and Politics. Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (2):220-240.
A. F. Mackay (2005). Aristotle's Dilemma. Journal of Ethics 9 (3-4):533 - 549.
Added to index2010-07-25
Total downloads15 ( #85,940 of 722,865 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,865 )
How can I increase my downloads?