American Philosophical Quarterly 3 (Jan):77-188 (1966)
|Abstract||This is a boiled down version of my doctoral dissertation. Ryle wouldn’t publish it, claiming that it is like ‘a well sharpened pencil that no one will ever use.’ I guess he turned to be right. Nevertheless I think it was, and is, a good paper.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nick Haslam (2002). Kinds of Kinds: A Conceptual Taxonomy of Psychiatric Categories. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology 9 (3):203-217.
David B. Kitts (1987). Plato on Kinds of Animals. Biology and Philosophy 2 (3):315-328.
George Graham & Hugh LaFollette (1982). Moral Kinds and Natural Kinds. Journal of Value Inquiry 16 (2):85-99.
Muhammad Ali Khalidi (2010). Interactive Kinds. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (2):335-360.
Rachel Cooper (2004). Why Hacking is Wrong About Human Kinds. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (1):73-85.
G. McOuat (2001). From Cutting Nature at its Joints to Measuring It: New Kinds and New Kinds of People in Biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (4):613-645.
Marzia Soavi (2009). Antirealism and Artefact Kinds. Techné 13 (2):93-107.
John S. Wilkins (forthcoming). Biological Essentialism and the Tidal Change of Natural Kinds. Science and Education.
Stefan Dragulinescu (2012). The Problem of Processes and Transitions: Are Diseases Phase Kinds? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (1):79-89.
Added to index2009-07-10
Total downloads11 ( #99,650 of 549,766 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,766 )
How can I increase my downloads?
|Start a new thread||There is 1 thread in this forum|
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
In this paper I described three fundamentally different kinds of classes; but the idea of ‘natural kinds’ never crossed my mind. (That shows how long ago it was.)
I guess I now should say something like, “The extension of a ‘natural kind’ K is governed by the (usually hidden) features that are responsible for such and such observable distinguishing features in these (pointing) paradigmatic Ks.”
That would give us an important, and interesting fourth kind of class. Right?