The neo-mohist conception of bian (disputation)
Journal of Chinese Philosophy 26 (1):1-19 (1999)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesNicholas Rescher (1977). Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge. State University of New York Press.
Raymond Plant (2009). The Neo-Liberal State. OUP Oxford.
Jane Geaney (1999). Associate Professor of Religion. Journal of the American Oriental Society 19 (1):1-11.
Chung-I. Lin (2011). Xunzi as a Semantic Inferentialist: Zhengmin, Bian-Shuo and Dao-Li. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 10 (3):311-340.
Paloma Pérez-Ilzarbe (2011). Disputation and Logic in the Medieval Treatises De Modo Opponendi Et Respondendi. Vivarium 49 (1-3):127-149.
E. J. Ashworth (1986). Renaissance Man as Logician: Josse Clichtove (1472–1543) on Disputations. History and Philosophy of Logic 7 (1):15-29.
Chris Fraser, More Mohist Marginalia: A Reply to Makeham on Later Mohist Canon and Explanation B 67.
Mary M. Garrett (1997). Chinese Buddhist Religious Disputation. Argumentation 11 (2):195-209.
Jane Geaney (1999). A Critique of A.C. Graham's Reconstruction of the "Neo-Mohist Canons". Journal of the American Oriental Society 19 (1):1-11.
Chris Fraser, Mohist Canons. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-08-10Total downloads15 ( #78,614 of 549,066 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,185 of 549,066 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
