Two views of inductive philosophizing
Kant-Studien 58 (1-4) (1967)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJoseph Kaipayil (1995). The Epistemology of Comparative Philosophy: A Critique with Reference to P.T. Raju's Views. Rome: Centre for Indian and Inter-Religious Studies.
Stuart S. Glennan (1994). Why There Can't Be a Logic of Induction. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:78 - 86.
Michael Strevens (2004). Bayesian Confirmation Theory: Inductive Logic, or Mere Inductive Framework? Synthese 141 (3):365 - 379.
Patrick Maher (2006). The Concept of Inductive Probability. Erkenntnis 65 (2):185 - 206.
Wesley C. Salmon (1977). Hempel's Conception of Inductive Inference in Inductive-Statistical Explanation. Philosophy of Science 44 (2):179-185.
Patrick Maher (2006). A Conception of Inductive Logic. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):513-523.
John D. Norton (2003). A Material Theory of Induction. Philosophy of Science 70 (4):647-670.
Lester Embree (2011). Wisdom More Than Knowledge and More Than Loved: Dorion Cairns's Revision of Husserl's Philosophical Ideal. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 41 (2):210-218.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2012-03-22Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
