Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):659-660 (2001)
|Abstract||We argue that confusability between items should be distinguished from generalization between items. Shepard's data concern confusability, but the theories proposed by Shepard and by Tenenbaum & Griffiths concern generalization, indicating a gap between theory and data. We consider the empirical and theoretical work involved in bridging this gap. [Shepard; Tenenbaum & Griffiths].|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Ken Cheng (2001). Generalization and Tinbergen's Four Whys. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):660-661.
Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Thomas L. Griffiths (2001). Generalization, Similarity, and Bayesian Inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):629-640.
David Dowe & Graham Oppy (2001). Universal Bayesian Inference? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):662-663.
Douglas Walton (1999). Rethinking the Fallacy of Hasty Generalization. Argumentation 13 (2):161-182.
Dominic W. Massaro (2001). Tribute to an Ideal Exemplar of Scientist and Person. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):688-689.
Carlo Cellucci (2009). The Universal Generalization Problem. Logique and Analyse 52 (205):3-20.
Dedre Gentner (2001). Exhuming Similarity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):669-669.
Michael D. Lee (2001). Extending Bayesian Concept Learning to Deal with Representational Complexity and Adaptation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):685-686.
Sinan Dogramaci (2010). Knowledge of Validity. Noûs 44 (3):403-432.
Emmanuel M. Pothos (2001). Context Effects Equally Applicable in Generalization and Similarity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):699-700.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?