What About Suicide Bombers? A Terse Response to a Terse Objection

Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 11 (2):233–236 (2011)
Abstract Stressing that the pronoun "I" picks out one and only one person in the world (i.e., me), I argue against Hunt (and other like-minded Rand commentators) that the supposed "hard case" of destructive people who do not care for their own lives poses no special difficulty for rational egoism. I conclude that the proper response to a terse objection like "What about suicide bombers?" is the equally terse assertion "But I don't want to get blown up."
Keywords Ethics  Suicide  Ayn Rand  Metaethics  Will to live
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive
External links This entry has no external links. Add one.
Through your library Configure

Similar books and articles
Daniel Shaw (1985). Absurdity and Suicide. Philosophy Research Archives 11:209-223.
Lachlan Doughney (2012). Ayn Rand and Deducing 'Ought' From 'Is'. Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 12 (1):151-168.
Kristján Kristjánsson (2008). Suicide Bombings and the Self. Journal of Global Ethics 4 (2):107 – 119.
David J. Mayo (1986). The Concept of Rational Suicide. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (2):143-155.
Michael Cholbi (2013). Suicide. International Encyclopedia of Ethics.

Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2012-04-21

Total downloads

41 ( #27,954 of 549,699 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

21 ( #2,693 of 549,699 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums