Graduate studies at Western
Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (3):491-505 (2006)
|Abstract||Kuhn's theory of paradigm reveals a pattern of scientific progress, in which normal science alternates with scientific revolution. But Kuhn underrated too much the function of scientific test in his pattern, because he focuses all his attention on the hypothetico-deductive schema instead of Bayesian schema. This paper employs Bayesian schema to re-examine Kuhn's theory of paradigm, to uncover its logical and rational components, and to illustrate the tensional structure of logic and belief, rationality and irrationality, in the process of scientific revolution|
|Keywords||paradigm Bayes scientific test incommensurability|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Vasso P. Kindi (1995). Kuhn'sthe Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 26 (1):75 - 92.
Bruce M. Psaty & Thomas S. Inui (1991). The Place of Human Values in the Language of Science: Kuhn, Saussure, and Structuralism. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (4).
Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1993). Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn's Philosophy of Science. University of Chicago Press.
William H. Austin (1972). Paradigms, Rationality, and Partial Communication. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 3 (2):203-218.
Morton E. Winston (1976). Did a (Kuhnian) Scientific Revolution Occur in Linguistics? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:25 - 33.
Hanne Andersen (2006). The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Cambridge University Press.
Mark A. Stone (1991). A Kuhnian Model of Falsifiability. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):177-185.
Paul Hoyningen-Huene (2008). Thomas Kuhn and the Chemical Revolution. Foundations of Chemistry 10 (2):101-115.
Jens Benninghoff, Hans-Jürgen Möller, Harald Hampel & Angelo Luigi Vescovi (2008). The Problem of Being a Paradigm: The Emergence of Neural Stem Cells as Example for “Kuhnian” Revolution in Biology or Misconception of the Scientific Community? Poiesis and Praxis 6 (1-2):3-11.
Lefteris Farmakis (2008). Did Tom Kuhn Actually Meet Tom Bayes? Erkenntnis 68 (1):41 - 53.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #95,683 of 739,521 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 739,521 )
How can I increase my downloads?