Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):678-689 (2011)
|Abstract||Communicable diseases, especially those that are highly contagious, are on the rise and each of us, no matter who we are or where we live, is equally at risk of transmitting contagious diseases to others as we are of contracting such diseases from others. Because contagious diseases are as readily passed state-to-state as person-to-person, we all have a stake in every country's ability to enact effective infectious disease control policies, while policies grounded in shared values are more likely to gain widespread acceptance and thereby prove most effective. This paper suggests that principlism proved invaluable as an ethical framework for resolving hard medical cases and setting health care policy because it nicely “fits” dilemmas that arise in the context of the special relationship between doctors and patients or within family units. It then argues that communitarianism provides the better foundation for crafting infectious diseases control policies because contagious diseases, which often pass between perfect strangers, raise questions about the moral obligations we owe to (or are entitled to demand of) people with whom we share no “special” relationship. Accordingly, a socially embedded framework such as communitarianism may be a better fit for the more socially embedded ethical dilemmas of communicable diseases|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Sabina Gainotti, Nicola Moran, Carlo Petrini & Darren Shickle (2008). Ethical Models Underpinning Responses to Threats to Public Health: A Comparison of Approaches to Communicable Disease Control in Europe. Bioethics 22 (9):466-476.
Stacy M. Carter & Lucie Rychetnik (2013). A Public Health Ethics Approach to Non-Communicable Diseases. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (1):17-18.
G. de Grandis (2011). On the Analogy Between Infectious Diseases and War: How to Use It and Not to Use It. Public Health Ethics 4 (1):70-83.
Roger S. Magnusson (2010). Global Health Governance and the Challenge of Chronic, Non-Communicable Disease. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (3):490-507.
Carly Ruderman, C. Tracy, Cécile Bensimon, Mark Bernstein, Laura Hawryluck, Randi Zlotnik Shaul & Ross Upshur (2006). On Pandemics and the Duty to Care: Whose Duty? Who Cares? BMC Medical Ethics 7 (1):1-6.
B. O. Rump & F. Woonink (2012). Ethical Questions Concerning the Use of Molecular Typing Techniques in the Control of Infectious Diseases. Public Health Ethics 5 (3):311-313.
Abigail Woods (2009). 'Partnership' in Action: Contagious Abortion and the Governance of Livestock Disease in Britain, 1885–1921. Minerva 47 (2):195-216.
Kayhan Parsi, Dhrubajyoti Bhattacharya & Justin List (2011). The Dread Disease: Cancer in the Developing World. Hastings Center Report 41 (3).
T. Bubela & S. Yanow (2012). Molecular Typing Technology: A Legal Perspective. Public Health Ethics 5 (3):317-320.
Neil Williams (2007). The Factory Model of Disease. The Monist 90 (4):555-584.
M. A. Y. Thomas (2005). Public Communication, Risk Perception, and the Viability of Preventive Vaccination Against Communicable Diseases. Bioethics 19 (4):407–421.
Thomas May (2005). Public Communication, Risk Perception, and the Viability of Preventive Vaccination Against Communicable Diseases. Bioethics 19 (4):407-421.
Stefan Dragulinescu (2012). The Problem of Processes and Transitions: Are Diseases Phase Kinds? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (1):79-89.
Sean A. Valles (2010). The Mystery of the Mystery of Common Genetic Diseases. Biology and Philosophy 25 (2):183-201.
Lawrie Reznek (1995). Dis-Ease About Kinds: Reply to D'Amico. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (5):571-584.
Added to index2011-11-16
Total downloads6 ( #145,761 of 549,753 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,753 )
How can I increase my downloads?