Hartshorne's argument for God's all-inclusiveness

Sophia 27 (1):2-10 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What does the second form of the ontological argument prove?H. Jong Kim - 2004 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 56 (1):17 - 40.
Process theism and physical evil.Ho Hua Chew - 1992 - Sophia 31 (3):16-27.
Emergentism, Perspectivism, and Divine Pathos.Donald A. Crosby - 2010 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 31 (3):196-206.
Professor Hartshorne's syllogism: Rejoinder.Charles Hartshorne - 1945 - Philosophical Review 54 (5):506-508.
Hartshorne’s Response.Charles Hartshorne & L. Bryant Keeling - 1993 - Process Studies 22 (3):172-172.
Some aspects of Hartshorne's treatment of Anselm.J. Smith - 1984 - In Charles Hartshorne, John B. Cobb & Franklin I. Gamwell (eds.), Existence and Actuality: Conversations with Charles Hartshorne. University of Chicago Press. pp. 103--9.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
17 (#849,202)

6 months
11 (#225,837)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Philosophers speak of God.Charles Hartshorne & William L. Reese (eds.) - 1953 - Amherst, N.Y.: Humanity Books.
Head, Heart, and God.Francis H. Parker - 1960 - Review of Metaphysics 14 (2):328 - 352.
Absolute Objects and Relative Subjects: A Reply.Charles Hartshorne - 1961 - Review of Metaphysics 15 (1):174 - 188.
A Natural Theology for our Time. [REVIEW]Robert Merrihew Adams - 1969 - Philosophical Review 78 (1):129-131.

View all 6 references / Add more references