Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 104 (4):525-535 (2011)
|Abstract||As part of a new focus on sustainability, this study examines the effects of technological attributes, market potential, and environmental factors on the commercialization of technologies. A survey was conducted on two of Taiwan’s promising sustainable high-tech industries—solar photovoltaic (PV) and light emitting diodes (LEDs). We found that if the technologies possess the specific attributes of innovativeness, genericness, simplicity, and compatibility, as required by the potential adopters, the level of market potential will be more favorable and technology commercialization (TC) probability will be higher. In addition, the results of regression analysis indicate that environmental requirements play moderating roles in affecting the relationships between market potential and TC probability. The empirical findings highlight the role of market potential as a mediator between technological attributes and the likelihood of commercialization. Furthermore, environmental factors moderate the influence of market potential on TC. The results of this study can provide firms’ operations with insights into resource allocation, sustainable development, and competitive advantages in an intensely competitive environment.|
|Keywords||Technology commercialization Technological attributes Environmental factors Market potential Green technology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Shiu-Wan Hung & Shih-Chang Tseng (2010). A New Framework Integrating Environmental Effects Into Technology Evaluation. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (4):543 - 556.
Jürgen Poesche (1998). Business Ethics in the Choice of New Technology in the Kraft Pulping Industry. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (5):471 - 489.
Erik Paredis (2011). Sustainability Transitions and the Nature of Technology. Foundations of Science 16 (2):195-225.
María Dolores López-Gamero, Enrique Claver-Cortés & José Francisco Molina-Azorín (2008). Complementary Resources and Capabilities for an Ethical and Environmental Management: A Qual/Quan Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 82 (3):701 - 732.
Andrew Jamison (2009). Can Nanotechnology Be Just? On Nanotechnology and the Emerging Movement for Global Justice. Nanoethics 3 (2):129-136.
George Kuk, Smeeta Fokeer & Woan Ting Hung (2005). Strategic Formulation and Communication of Corporate Environmental Policy Statements: UK Firms' Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 58 (4):375 - 385.
Mary Tiles (2009). Technology and the Possibility of Global Environmental Science. Synthese 168 (3):433 - 452.
Yi-Hui Ho (2011). Determinants of Green Practice Adoption for Logistics Companies in China. Journal of Business Ethics 98 (1):67 - 83.
Jean L. Johnson, Kelly D. Martin & Amit Saini (2011). Strategic Culture and Environmental Dimensions as Determinants of Anomie in Publicly-Traded and Privately-Held Firms. Business Ethics Quarterly 21 (3):473-502.
Joe DesJardins (1998). Corporate Environmental Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (8):825 - 838.
Uma Balakrishnan, Tim Duvall & Patrick Primeaux (2003). Rewriting the Bases of Capitalism: Reflexive Modernity and Ecological Sustainability as the Foundations of a New Normative Framework. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 47 (4):299 - 314.
Raine Isaksson, Peter Johansson & Klaus Fischer (2010). Detecting Supply Chain Innovation Potential for Sustainable Development. Journal of Business Ethics 97 (3):425 - 442.
X. D. Xu, S. X. Zeng & C. M. Tam (2012). Stock Market's Reaction to Disclosure of Environmental Violations: Evidence From China. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 107 (2):227-237.
Added to index2011-11-22
Total downloads3 ( #214,063 of 740,017 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,960 of 740,017 )
How can I increase my downloads?