On a recent naturalism debate in business ethics – from a philosophy point of view

Journal of Business Ethics 82 (4):889 - 898 (2008)
William C. Frederick proposes a naturalistic business ethics. Many commentators focus on the issues of naturalistic fallacy, deprivation of freedom of the will, and possibility of important and universal moral values in business ethics. I argue that an ethics being naturalistic is not a worry. The issue of deprivation of free will is irrelevant. Yet there are urgent questions regarding the possibility of important and universal moral values, which may prevent Frederick’s view from getting off the ground.
Keywords naturalism  naturalistic ethics  naturalistic fallacy  sociobiology  mutualism  altruism  contemporary philosophy  G.E. Moore  William C. Frederick  Timothy L. Fort  William Hamilton
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 13,012
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Timothy L. Fort (1997). How Relationality Shapes Business and its Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12-13):1381-1391.
Timothy L. Fort (1997). Naturalism and Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 7 (3):145-155.

View all 10 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

12 ( #145,109 of 1,410,182 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #107,948 of 1,410,182 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.