On the metaphysical significance of ti (body–embodiment) in chinese philosophy: Benti (origin–substance) and ti–yong (substance and function)
Journal of Chinese Philosophy 29 (2):145–161 (2002)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohn Kronen & Jacob Tuttle (2011). Composite Substances as True Wholes: Toward a Modified Nyāya-Vaiśeṣika Theory of Composite Substances. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):289-316.
Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2008). Descartes's Substance Dualism and His Independence Conception of Substance. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (1):69-89.
Richard Swinburne (2009). Substance Dualism. Faith and Philosophy 26 (5):501 - 513.
Frank A. Lewis (1991). Substance and Predication in Aristotle. Cambridge University Press.
Kanu Ikechukwu Anthony (2012). The Problem of Substance in Metaphysics. African Research Review 1 (1):24-29.
Fang Keli (1986). On the Categories of Substance and Function in Chinese Philosophy. Contemporary Chinese Thought 17 (3):26-77.
Daniel von Wachter (2007). God as Substance Without Substance Ontology. In Christian Kanzian & Muhammed Legenhausen (eds.), Substance and Attribute: Western and Islamic Traditions in Dialogue.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads5 ( #160,368 of 549,088 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,088 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
