Reconstruction of the Optical Revolution: Lakatos vs. Laudan

Abstract
According to Lakatos's theory of scientific change, the victory of the wave theory in the nineteenth-century optical revolution was due to its empirical successes. However, historical facts do not support this opinion. Based on Laudan's theory of scientific change, this paper presents a different orientation to reconstruct the optical revolution. By comparing the conceptual problems that both optical theories had, this paper argues that it was the inferior status of the corpuscular theory in dealing with conceptual problems that constituted the primary cause of the optical revolution.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,357
External links
  • Through your library Configure
    References found in this work BETA

    No references found.

    Citations of this work BETA

    No citations found.

    Similar books and articles
    Rachel Laudan (1978). The Recent Revolution in Geology and Kuhn's Theory of Scientific Change. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:227 - 239.
    J. Kadvany (2012). Chocolate and Chess (Unlocking Lakatos). [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (2):276-286.
    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2011-05-29

    Total downloads

    2 ( #258,148 of 1,088,623 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,623 )

    How can I increase my downloads?

    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.