Some arguments for propositional logic: MacColl as a philosopher

Philosophia Scientiae 15:129-147 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

L’article examine les raisons philosophiques, plutôt que mathématiques ou logiques, pour lesquelles MacColl a pu vouloir développer une logique propositionnelle. Nous trouvons des éléments de réponse dans le refus discret d’endosser une logique des choses, dans l’anti-psychologisme nuancé de MacColl, et dans une subtile épistémologie de la certitude liée à un usage méthodique de la grammaire.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Stoic Logic.Susanne Bobzien - 2003 - In Brad Inwood (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Stoic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
The propositional logic of ordinary discourse.William S. Cooper - 1968 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 11 (1-4):295 – 320.
The development of probability logic from leibniz to maccoll.Theodore Hailperin - 1988 - History and Philosophy of Logic 9 (2):131-191.
A propositional dynamic logic with qualitative probabilities.Dimitar P. Guelev - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (6):575-604.
Visual methods for argument verification and semantic analysis.Alfonso Cabanzo - 2011 - Logos: Revista de la Facultad de Filosofia y Humanidades 19 (Logic, visual methods):79-105.
Propositional Logic Card Games.Anthony Shiver - 2013 - Teaching Philosophy 36 (1):51-58.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-18

Downloads
12 (#929,405)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

V.—Some Controverted Points in Symbolic Logic.A. T. Shearman - 1905 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 5 (1):74-105.
Boole's abandoned propositional logic.Theodore Hailperin - 1984 - History and Philosophy of Logic 5 (1):39-48.

Add more references