David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 112 (2):187-203 (2013)
The main purpose of this paper is to better understand how sustainability rating agencies, through discourse, promote an “ideology of numbers” that ultimately aims to establish a regime of normalization governing social and environmental performance. Drawing on Thompson’s (Ideology and modern culture: Critical social theory in the era of mass communication, 1990 ) modes of operation of ideology, we examine the extent to which, and how, the ideology of numbers is reflected on websites and public documents published by a range of sustainability rating agencies. Our analysis indicates that the ideology of numbers promotes a relatively narrow vision of corporate social and environmental responsibility. That is, it establishes some areas of visibility while leaving in the shadow certain aspects of the ways in which companies fulfill, or fail to meet, their social and environmental responsibilities. The ideology of numbers also exerts power by identifying those companies that are deemed to be worthy of inclusion, or not, in a supposedly socially responsible corporate elite.
|Keywords||Disciplinary power Discourse analysis Ideology of numbers Mechanisms of exclusion Rating agencies Sustainability|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Kathryn J. Brasier (2002). Ideology and Discourse: Characterizations of the 1996 Farm Bill by Agricultural Interest Groups. [REVIEW] Agriculture and Human Values 19 (3):239-253.
Stephen Dillenburg, Timothy Greene & Homer Erekson (2003). Approaching Socially Responsible Investment with a Comprehensive Ratings Scheme: Total Social Impact. Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):167 - 177.
Bastien Drut (2010). Sovereign Bonds and Socially Responsible Investment. Journal of Business Ethics 92 (1):131 - 145.
Michel Foucault (1982). The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry 8 (4):777.
Caroline Gauthier (2005). Measuring Corporate Social and Environmental Performance: The Extended Life-Cycle Assessment. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 59 (1-2):199 - 206.
Citations of this work BETA
Jeremy Galbreath (2013). ESG in Focus: The Australian Evidence. Journal of Business Ethics 118 (3):529-541.
Similar books and articles
Gayil Talshir (2005). The Phoenix of Ideology. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (2):107-124.
Béatrice Parguel, Florence Benoît-Moreau & Fabrice Larceneux (2011). How Sustainability Ratings Might Deter 'Greenwashing': A Closer Look at Ethical Corporate Communication. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 102 (1):15-28.
Jordy Rocheleau (2002). Communications Theory and the Future of Ideology Critique. Social Philosophy Today 18:83-96.
Tom Casier (1999). The Shattered Horizon How Ideology Mattered to Soviet Politics. Studies in East European Thought 51 (1):35-59.
Mathew Humphrey (2005). (De) Contesting Ideology: The Struggle Over the Meaning of the Struggle Over Meaning. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (2):225-246.
Massimo Pigliucci (2012). Biology and Ideology: From Descartes to Dawkins. [REVIEW] Science and Education 15 (1).
Marc W. Steinberg (1993). Rethinking Ideology: A Dialogue with Fine and Sandstrom From a Dialogic Perspective. Sociological Theory 11 (3):314-320.
Ian Adams (1989). The Logic of Political Belief: A Philosophical Analysis of Ideology. Barnes & Noble Books.
Anssi Halmesvirta (2006). Ideology and Argument: Studies in British, Finnish and Hungarian Thought. Sks/Finnish Literature Society.
Raymond Boudon (1989). The Analysis of Ideology. University of Chicago Press.
Teun Adrianus van Dijk (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Sage Publications.
Michael Freeden (2003). Ideology: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Jijun Gao & Pratima Bansal (2013). Instrumental and Integrative Logics in Business Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics 112 (2):241-255.
Added to index2012-02-29
Total downloads4 ( #255,805 of 1,101,573 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #117,010 of 1,101,573 )
How can I increase my downloads?