David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (1):67-82 (2008)
Whether empirical givenness has the reliability that foundationalists expect is a point about which some philosophers are highly skeptical. Sellars took the doctrine of givenness as a “myth,” denying the existence of immediate perceptual experience. The arguments in contemporary Western epistemology are concentrated on whether sensory experience has conceptual contents, and whether there is any logical relationship between perceptions and beliefs. In fact, once the elements of words and conceptions in empirical perception are affirmed, the logical relationship between perceptual experience and empirical belief is also affirmed. This relationship takes place through perceptual experience acting as evidence for beliefs. The real problem lies in how one should distinguish between the different relationships with perception of singular beliefs and of universal beliefs, and in how singular beliefs can provide justification for universal beliefs.
|Keywords||empirical foundation justification epistemology 经验基础 确证 知识论|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Bertrand Russell (1912). The Problems of Philosophy. Barnes & Noble Books.
Brewer Bill (2005). Does Perceptual Experience Have Conceptual Content. In Steup Matthias & Sosa Ernest (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Blackwell
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Richard Schantz (2001). The Given Regained: Reflections on the Sensuous Content of Experience. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (1):167-180.
Santiago Echeverri (2010). Epistemic Responsibility and Perceptual Experience. In David Lauer, Christophe Laudou, Robin Celikates & Georg W. Bertram (eds.), Expérience Et Réflexivité: Perspectives au-Delà de L’Empirisme Et de L’Idéalisme. L'harmattan
David Hilbert (1994). Is Seeing Believing? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:446 - 453.
Cheryl K. Chen (2006). Empirical Content and Rational Constraint. Inquiry 49 (3):242 – 264.
Michael Huemer (1997). Probability and Coherence Justification. Southern Journal of Philosophy 35 (4):463-472.
Bill Brewer (1999). Perception and Reason. Oxford University Press.
Richard Otte (1990). Scientific Realism, Perceptual Beliefs, and Justification. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:393 - 404.
Richard Schantz (1999). The Role of Sensory Experience in Epistemic Justification: A Problem for Coherentism. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 50 (2-3):177-191.
Chen Jiaming (2008). The Empirical Foundation and Justification of Knowledge. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 3 (1):67 - 82.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads47 ( #89,869 of 1,906,955 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #162,336 of 1,906,955 )
How can I increase my downloads?